Is this you? Claim this profile to correct it, add a bio and choose the work people see first.

Claim this profile

Works334 from public data

TitleCited by
  • Attention-based LSTM for Aspect-level Sentiment Classification

    Yequan Wang, Minlie Huang, Xiaoyan Zhu, Zhao Li

    Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · 2016

    This paper reveals that the sentiment polarity of a sentence is not only determined by the content but is also highly related to the concerned aspect, and proposes an Attention-based Long Short-Term Memory Network for aspect-level sentiment classification.

    2,397
  • ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Tools

    Team GLM, :, Aohan Zeng, Xu, Bin, Bowen Wang, Chenhui Zhang, Yin, Da, Zhang, Dan, +22 more

    arXiv · 2024

    This report primarily focuses on the GLM-4 language series, which includes GLM-4, GLM-4-Air, and GLM-4-9B, which represent the most capable models that are trained with all the insights and lessons gained from the preceding three generations of ChatGLM.

    1,810
  • AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents

    Xiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu, Xuanyu Lei, Hanyu Lai, Gu, Yu, Hangliang Ding, +14 more

    arXiv · 2023

    AgentBench is presented, a multi-dimensional benchmark that consists of 8 distinct environments to assess LLM-as-Agent's reasoning and decision-making abilities and shows that poor long-term reasoning, decision-making, and instruction following abilities are the main obstacles for developing usable LLM agents.

    1,460
  • Pre-trained models: Past, present and future

    Xu Han, Zhengyan Zhang, Ning Ding, Yuxian Gu, Xiao Liu, Yuqi Huo, Jiezhong Qiu, Yuan Yao, +16 more

    AI Open · 2021

    A deep look into the history of pre-training, especially its special relation with transfer learning and self-supervised learning, is taken to reveal the crucial position of PTMs in the AI development spectrum.

    1,134
  • Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectors

    Chujie Zheng, Hao Zhou, Fandong Meng, Jie Zhou, Minlie Huang

    arXiv · 2023

    This work proposes a label-free, inference-time debiasing method, called PriDe, which separates the model's prior bias for option IDs from the overall prediction distribution, and demonstrates that it achieves interpretable and transferable debiasing with high computational efficiency.

    620
  • Towards Emotional Support Dialog Systems

    Siyang Liu, Chujie Zheng, Orianna DeMasi, Sahand Sabour, Li Yu, Zhou Yu, Yong Jiang, Minlie Huang

    Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2021

    The Emotional Support Conversation task is defined and an ESC Framework is proposed, which is grounded on the Helping Skills Theory, to show the importance of support strategies in providing effective emotional support and the utility of ESConv in training more emotional support systems.

    535
  • Commonsense Knowledge Aware Conversation Generation with Graph Attention

    Hao Zhou, Tom Young, Minlie Huang, Haizhou Zhao, Jingfang Xu, Xiaoyan Zhu

    International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2018

    This is the first attempt that uses large-scale commonsense knowledge in conversation generation, and unlike existing models that use knowledge triples (entities) separately and independently, this model treats each knowledge graph as a whole, which encodes more structured, connected semantic information in the graphs.

    525
  • GLM-4.5: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding (ARC) Foundation Models

    Team, Aohan Zeng, Lv, Xin, Qinkai Zheng, Zhenyu Hou, Bin Chen, Chengxing Xie, Cunxiang Wang, +22 more

    arXiv · 2025

    GLM-4.5 is presented, an open-source Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) large language model with 355B total parameters and 32B activated parameters, featuring a hybrid reasoning method that supports both thinking and direct response modes that ranks 3rd overall among all evaluated models and 2nd on agentic benchmarks.

    474
  • Learning to identify review spam

    Fangtao Li, Minlie Huang, Yi Yang, Xiaoyan Zhu

    International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2011

    This paper exploits machine learning methods to identify review spam and provides a twoview semi-supervised method, co-training, to exploit the large amount of unlabeled data and shows that the proposed method is effective.

    440
  • TransG : A Generative Model for Knowledge Graph Embedding

    Han Xiao, Minlie Huang, Xiaoyan Zhu

    Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) · 2016

    This paper addresses a new issue of multiple relation semantics that a relation may have multiple meanings revealed by the entity pairs associated with the corresponding triples, and proposes a novel Gaussian mixture model for embedding, TransG, which can discover latent semantics for a relation and leverage a mixture of relation component vectors for embeddedding a fact triple.

    369
  • Structure-Aware Review Mining and Summarization

    Fangtao Li, Chao Han, Minlie Huang, Xiaoyan Zhu, Yingju Xia, Shu Zhang, Hao Yu

    International Conference on Computational Linguistics · 2010

    This paper proposes a new machine learning framework based on Conditional Random Fields that can employ rich features to jointly extract positive opinions, negative opinions and object features for review sentences and shows that structure-aware models outperform many state-of-the-art approaches to review mining.

    362
  • Challenges in Building Intelligent Open-domain Dialog Systems

    Minlie Huang, Xiaoyan Zhu, Jianfeng Gao

    ACM Transactions on Information Systems · 2020

    This article reviews the recent work on neural approaches that are devoted to addressing three challenges in developing intelligent open-domain dialog systems: semantics, consistency, and interactiveness.

    359
  • Reinforcement Learning for Relation Classification From Noisy Data

    Jun Feng, Minlie Huang, Zhao Li, Yang Yang, Xiaoyan Zhu

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2018

    Experiment results show that the proposed novel model can deal with the noise of data effectively and obtains better performance for relation classification at the sentence level.

    355
  • ToRA: A Tool-Integrated Reasoning Agent for Mathematical Problem Solving

    Zhibin Gou, Shao, Zhihong, Yeyun Gong, Yelong Shen, Yujiu Yang, Minlie Huang, Nan Duan, Weizhu Chen

    arXiv · 2023

    This paper proposes ToRA a series of Tool-integrated Reasoning Agents designed to solve challenging mathematical problems by seamlessly integrating natural language reasoning with the utilization of external tools, thereby amalgamating the analytical prowess of language and the computational efficiency of tools.

    331
  • Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agents

    Zhexin Zhang, Shiyao Cui, Yida Lu, Jingzhuo Zhou, Junxiao Yang, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang

    arXiv · 2024

    This paper introduces Agent-SafetyBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the safety of LLM agents, and summarizes two fundamental safety defects in current LLM agents: lack of robustness and lack of risk awareness.

    311
  • Augmenting End-to-End Dialogue Systems With Commonsense Knowledge

    Tom Young, Erik Cambria, Iti Chaturvedi, Hao Zhou, Subham Biswas, Minlie Huang

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2018

    This model represents the first attempt to integrating a large commonsense knowledge base into end-to-end conversational models and suggests that the knowledge-augmented models are superior to their knowledge-free counterparts.

    282
  • A Knowledge-Enhanced Pretraining Model for Commonsense Story Generation

    Jian Guan, Fei Huang, Zhihao Zhao, Xiaoyan Zhu, Minlie Huang

    Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · 2020

    A knowledge-enhanced pretraining model to utilize commonsense knowledge from external knowledge bases to generate reasonable stories that can generate more reasonable stories than state-of-the-art baselines, particularly in terms of logic and global coherence.

    269
  • A Hierarchical Framework for Relation Extraction with Reinforcement Learning

    Ryuichi Takanobu, Tianyang Zhang, Jiexi Liu, Minlie Huang

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2019

    This paper presents a novel paradigm to deal with relation extraction by regarding the related entities as the arguments of a relation and applies a hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) framework in this paradigm to enhance the interaction between entity mentions and relation types.

    253
  • Sentiment Analysis with Global Topics and Local Dependency

    Fangtao Li, Minlie Huang, Xiaoyan Zhu

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2010

    This paper proposes a major departure from the previous approaches by assuming that the sentiments are related to the topic in the document, and puts forward a joint sentiment and topic model, i.e. Sentiment-LDA, and shows that exploiting the sentiment dependency is clearly advantageous, and that the Dependency-Sentiment- LDA is an effective approach for sentiment analysis.

    250
  • Discovering patterns to extract protein–protein interactions from full texts

    Minlie Huang, Xiaoyan Zhu, Yu Hao, Donald G. Payan, Kunbin Qu, Ming Li

    Bioinformatics · 2004

    A robust and powerful methodology to mine protein-protein interactions from biomedical texts by using a dynamic programming algorithm to compute distinguishing patterns by aligning relevant sentences and key verbs that describe protein interactions.

    248
  • SSP: Semantic Space Projection for Knowledge Graph Embedding with Text Descriptions

    Han Xiao, Minlie Huang, Meng Lian, Xiaoyan Zhu

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2017

    This paper proposes the semantic space projection (SSP) model, a model which jointly learns from the symbolic triples and textual descriptions to discover semantic relevance and offer precise semantic embedding.

    196
  • Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models with Iterative Retrieval-Generation Synergy

    Zhihong Shao, Yeyun Gong, Yelong Shen, Minlie Huang, Nan Duan, Weizhu Chen

    Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · 2023

    189
  • COLD: A Benchmark for Chinese Offensive Language Detection

    Jiawen Deng, Jingyan Zhou, Hao Sun, Chujie Zheng, Fei Mi, Helen M. L. Meng, Minlie Huang

    Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · 2022

    The factors that influence the offensive generations are investigated, and it is found that anti-bias contents and keywords referring to certain groups or revealing negative attitudes trigger offensive outputs easier.

    183
  • The gene normalization task in BioCreative III

    Zhiyong Lu, Hung‐Yu Kao, Chih-Hsuan Wei, Minlie Huang, Jingchen Liu, Cheng-Ju Kuo, Chun‐Nan Hsu, Richard Tzong‐Han Tsai, +20 more

    BMC Bioinformatics · 2011

    Evaluating teams using the gold standard and inferred ground truth shows that the EM algorithm allows team submissions to be differentiated while keeping the manual annotation effort feasible, and shows measures of comparative performance between teams.

    182
  • Densely Connected CNN with Multi-scale Feature Attention for Text Classification

    Shiyao Wang, Minlie Huang, Zhidong Deng

    International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2018

    A densely connected CNN with multi-scale feature attention with competitive performance against state-of-the-art baselines on five benchmark datasets and reveals the model's ability to select proper n-gram features for text classification.

    180

Show all 334 works

Publication data from OpenAlex, with missing venues and authors filled in from Crossref; citation counts are the higher of OpenAlex and Semantic Scholar, last synced 2026-10-12. One-sentence summaries under some papers are written by Semantic Scholar’s model. Citation counts may be lower than on Google Scholar, which indexes more sources.

Report an error

Wrong papers, two people merged into one, or a profile that should not be here? Tell us and we will fix or hide it.

Sign in to report